Divorce law in india

Rejection Of Maintenance Is Invalid During The Divorce Proceedings

The Right to Maintenance under section 125 Cr.P.C. of wife cannot be taken away even if an application of maintenance is rejected during the pendency of the Divorce petition. If a husband files a petition challenging the order and the maintenance under Sec 125 Cr.P.C before the Family Court where the divorce petition is pending, the husband cannot claim to not give maintenance to the wife. The husband is bound to pay the maintenance as per the decision passed by the court. If a petition filed by the husband under the impugned order of the maintenance is a direct violation of the consent orders clearly stated and passed by the High Court or the Supreme Court.

ROLE OF FAMILY COURT

  • Family Court should appreciate the order passed on the issue by the High Court or the Supreme Court
  • Family Court should maintain the mechanical manner of application filed.
  • Family Court should not without proper justice procedure make decisions, as cases are of sensitive nature.

 

HUSBAND REFUSES TO GIVE MAINTENANCE IS INVALID

If the husband files a petition against the impugned order and the maintenance petition it is in direct violation of the consent order duly clarified and reiterated by a Division Bench of High Court and the judgment passed by the Supreme Court. And if the Family Court, in a mechanical manner had dismissed the application filed by the husband for dismissal of the maintenance petition filed by the respondent wife without appreciating the orders passed on the issue then the dismissal is invalid and stands challenging.

HUSBAND CANNOT CLAIM NOT TO PAY MAINTENANCE IF 

  1. He has making payment of school fees of their children.
  2. He is earning less amount of salary than before.
  3. He has to maintain his parents.
  4. He is unemployment after the divorce decree is passed.
  5. He is alcoholic and is unable to pay the wife.

The Husband cannot claim not to pay the maintenance to the wife just because he has been making payment of school fees of their children. It is the duty of the husband which is ordered by the court to give maintenance to the wife and such order passed by the court shall not be challenged. If the husband has stop making any payment of maintenance to his wife on the basis that he has been making payment of school fees of the children, the husband is violating the right of maintenance of the wife. The husband if files a petition in the family court will also violate the consent order with impunity which means he cannot say that the wife cannot seek the remedial measures.

HUSBAND CAN CLAIM NOT TO PAY MAINTENANCE ONLY 

The husband can only claim such petition if he has notified the court about the non capacity of making the payment for the maintenance to the wife, that if the husband has any reservations due to which he cannot pay the intimated maintenance. But later on the husband cannot claim that he does want or have the capacity to make payment of maintenance.

CONCLUSION

The Right of Maintenance of the wife is guarded by law and therefore, the husband who has failed to comply with the order given by the court he cannot claim that the wife must act under the given order. Under section 125 Cr.P.C. the scope and ambit of maintenance is huge and the wife is entitled to this right even if due to the pendency of the divorce petition the application for maintenance gets rejected is completely void and against the law.

We are always happy and ready to assist you in your hard time.

We are just a call away!

Please do not hesitate to contact us at 9213782334 or email us at [email protected]  or leave a query at our website: gsbagga.com  or our assistance.

Thanks for reading our blog!

Your review and comments are valuable for us. Please do not hesitate to improve us should you have any suggestions or opinion.

Together we can and bring CHANGE in the society!

GS Bagga
GS Bagga
Articles: 232

There is no warranty as regards the accurateness or completion of any or all information provided on this website. Consequently, any loss or damage caused due to reason of any error or omissions, resulting from negligence, accident or any other reason or creation of any liability to any person due to such loss or damage is categorically disclaimed and disowned by the company.
Company further neither takes responsibility nor warrants for interpretation or use of any information, provided on our website, either expressly or impliedly by anyone according to their understanding.
As regards the links provided on the website, it is categorically informed that the company owes no liability for any referral made to or any endorsements of or any affiliations with such links. Consequently, the company does not make any representations or warranties about claims made on such links.
Any information collected from our website bars anyone and everyone from creating a lawyer-client relationship amongst the website user and the company. Consequently, the information so provided should be excluded from the legal definition of being constituted as an invitation for a relationship of a lawyer-client. Accordingly, any transmission, receipt or using such information also debars creation of any legal relationship.
As a result, the owner would represent anyone desiring representation only on the basis of personal meeting, whereby the user seeks for the advice of competent counsel in the country/state to which the information is provided on the website. Consequently, anyone who wishes to be represented in a country where such laws fail to comply is categorically advised not to approach the counsel for such representations.
It is further advised that the reader must not adhere to sending of confidential or sensitive information through email over the internet as it is susceptible to risk of lack of confidentiality.
Website thus may only be utilised for the purposes of gathering information only and any information so reflecting on the webpage may not be up-to-date, complete or correct.